Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
73.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX edges out Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (135g / 4,76oz) and the maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). Still, Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a line retrieve per crank of 101 centimeter / 39.76 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa Freams LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.1 out of 10 (135g / 4,76oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
