Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.57 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
