Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
