Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
