Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (138g / 4,87oz). While Daiwa TD FEEDER QD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.08 out of 10 (138g / 4,87oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
