Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
64.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX edges out Daiwa TD Match 4012X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (143g / 5,04oz) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa TD Match 4012X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa TD Match?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.05 out of 10 (143g / 5,04oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD Match 4012X
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
