Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.49 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
