Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100
Conclusion
Both Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX and Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch, while Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX stands out for a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 21 Presso LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
