Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X
