Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
