Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin REDIX
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX