Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X
