Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX
