Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X stands out for a ball bearings of 4+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
