Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
