Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.26 out of 10 (305g / 10,76oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
