Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
