Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF offers a gear ratio of 5.5:1, while Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Delphin YUPIE
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Delphin YUPIE
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Delphin YUPIE
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin YUPIE
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
