Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
59.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.49 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight635g / 22.4oz
Line retireve per crank110 centimeter / 43.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/300
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF offers a gear ratio of 5.5:1, while Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX stands out for a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa BG MQ?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), the reel delivers reliable, smooth resistance when targeting strong fighters like snapper or pollock
- Scoring 8.19 out of 10 (635g / 22,4oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano TLD 15X
