Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
