Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24.02 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €24.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/140

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF offers a ball bearings of 7, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag stands out for a maximum drag of 4 kg. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (7), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
