Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (4). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin REDIX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
