Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Feeder And Match
90.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight455g / 16.05oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €312.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (7), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
