Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
