Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Spinning

45.30 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag-

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €17.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Spinning

45.80 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag-

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €17.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m

Conclusion

Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles