Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.61 out of 10) and total score (7.58 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX
Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
