Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
Feeder And Match
51.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/230

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (8.54 out of 10). While Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
