Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
