Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX
