Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (185g / 6,53oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
