Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the weight (185g / 6,53oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX
