Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 39.0 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X
