Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €209.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
