Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X stands out for a weight of 160g / 5,64oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
