Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Prorex LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX
