Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
