Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT, 6000-SS (Feeder), left and right hand, Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-600
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
6000-ss (feeder)x
56.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €59.00
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000-SS (Feeder)
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT, 2500-XH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10609-250
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €96.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X, offering significantly better performance in weight (205g / 7,23oz) and ergonomics (6.32 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables