Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
6000-ss (feeder)x
56.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €59.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000-SS (Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (215g / 7,58oz). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT and Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
