Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT, 3000-C (Match), left and right hand, Match fishing reel, Front Drag, 10217-300
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €49.00
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-C (Match)
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT, 4000-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10609-400
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €98.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables