Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.56 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
