Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X and Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X offers a ball bearings of 4, while Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX stands out for a durability of 5.57 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
