Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05 lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05 lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
