Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
71.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €68.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
