Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a ball bearings of 7, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
