Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
