Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
