Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and weight (265g / 9,35oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.49 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX