Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
