Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano 21 Sustain
Spinning
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5:3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €209.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 240/2.4
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X and Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano 21 Sustain?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
