Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Daiwa TD FEEDER QD with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (175g / 6,17oz) and the durability (8.53 out of 10). Still, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter and a maximum drag of 8kg, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
